On 12/03/2015 09:58 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 08:44 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> Updated packages have been posted for testing:
>>
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7rolling/testing/x86_64/
>>
>> With the recent release of TUV 7.2, we have assembled the relevant security
>> errata packages within the SL 7 testing repo.
>>
>> Please test these packages to verify they produce the expected behavior.
>> These will be published for all versions of Scientific Linux 7 on
>> Dec 21, 2015
>>
>>
>> You can install this update for testing via the sl-testing repo on
>> your SL system:
>>    yum --enablerepo=sl-testing update <package you wish to test>
>>
>>
>> Updates include:
>> libreport-rhel-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm
>> libreport-rhel-anaconda-bugzilla-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm
>> libreport-rhel-bugzilla-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm
>>
> You appear to be missing libreport-plugin-rhtsupport-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm
> which causes problems updating systems with
> libreport-plugin-rhtsupport-2.1.11-23.sl7 installed.

Hmmmm..... I'd rather not publish libreport-plugin-rhtsupport (or the 
libreport-rhel bits) as SL doesn't have rhel support.  My test box 
upgraded safely, but it required the libreport-rhel bits.... of course 
it also managed to apply with the broken systemd repo dep so that box is 
super messed up and probably not trustworthy....

I'll build a new test box (and probably push the new 
libreport-plugin-rhtsupport later on today)

>
>> systemd-219-19.el7.x86_64.rpm
> I'm also seeing:
>
> --> Processing Conflict: systemd-219-19.el7.x86_64 conflicts initscripts <
> 9.49.28-1
>
> Error: systemd conflicts with initscripts-9.49.24-1.el7.x86_64
>
> So it looks like you need to add in a newer initscripts.
>

Good catch, fix published and repodata updated.