On 12/03/2015 09:58 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 12/03/2015 08:44 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> Updated packages have been posted for testing: >> >> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7rolling/testing/x86_64/ >> >> With the recent release of TUV 7.2, we have assembled the relevant security >> errata packages within the SL 7 testing repo. >> >> Please test these packages to verify they produce the expected behavior. >> These will be published for all versions of Scientific Linux 7 on >> Dec 21, 2015 >> >> >> You can install this update for testing via the sl-testing repo on >> your SL system: >> yum --enablerepo=sl-testing update <package you wish to test> >> >> >> Updates include: >> libreport-rhel-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm >> libreport-rhel-anaconda-bugzilla-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm >> libreport-rhel-bugzilla-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm >> > You appear to be missing libreport-plugin-rhtsupport-2.1.11-31.sl7.x86_64.rpm > which causes problems updating systems with > libreport-plugin-rhtsupport-2.1.11-23.sl7 installed. Hmmmm..... I'd rather not publish libreport-plugin-rhtsupport (or the libreport-rhel bits) as SL doesn't have rhel support. My test box upgraded safely, but it required the libreport-rhel bits.... of course it also managed to apply with the broken systemd repo dep so that box is super messed up and probably not trustworthy.... I'll build a new test box (and probably push the new libreport-plugin-rhtsupport later on today) > >> systemd-219-19.el7.x86_64.rpm > I'm also seeing: > > --> Processing Conflict: systemd-219-19.el7.x86_64 conflicts initscripts < > 9.49.28-1 > > Error: systemd conflicts with initscripts-9.49.24-1.el7.x86_64 > > So it looks like you need to add in a newer initscripts. > Good catch, fix published and repodata updated.