On 03/25/2014 11:12 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> 
>> On 03/25/2014 12:48 PM, Andras Horvath wrote:
>>> Would this mean that the support of the minor branches would end and
>>> only the most recent minor version would get the long term support?
>>> If so, then I strongly believe that one of the most precious
>>> advantages of SL would disappear - compared to CentOS AFAIK.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> How do these point releases map to RHEL point releases ? And what level
>> of testing is done to ensure sanity within that point release in SL ?
>>
>>
> 
> RHEL 6.1 -->  SL 6.1
> RHEL 6.2 -->  SL 6.2

where do you get the sources for 6.1 or 6.2 given that they are not
published on ftp.redhat.com ?




-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc