On 03/25/2014 11:12 PM, Connie Sieh wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> On 03/25/2014 12:48 PM, Andras Horvath wrote: >>> Would this mean that the support of the minor branches would end and >>> only the most recent minor version would get the long term support? >>> If so, then I strongly believe that one of the most precious >>> advantages of SL would disappear - compared to CentOS AFAIK. >>> >>> >> >> How do these point releases map to RHEL point releases ? And what level >> of testing is done to ensure sanity within that point release in SL ? >> >> > > RHEL 6.1 --> SL 6.1 > RHEL 6.2 --> SL 6.2 where do you get the sources for 6.1 or 6.2 given that they are not published on ftp.redhat.com ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc