SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:46:26 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On 01/17/2014 05:32 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> To put it in perspective, this deal is huge, not all information is
> available, so it is normal that some people are speculating, share opinions,
> or provide answers. Even Karanbir is involved, so some of the speculation
> can result in new information right here.
>
> So I don't think there is a need for action (at least not at this point).
>

Agreed.

Let's keep the discussion to topics that are relevant to the future of
Scientific Linux.  Not the merits of capitalism vs communism, the motivations
of companies, etc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2