SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:46:26 -0600
Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Subject:
From:
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
Argonne National Laboratory
Comments:
To: Dag Wieers <[log in to unmask]> cc: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <[log in to unmask]>, Jos Vos <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On 01/17/2014 05:32 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> To put it in perspective, this deal is huge, not all information is
> available, so it is normal that some people are speculating, share opinions,
> or provide answers. Even Karanbir is involved, so some of the speculation
> can result in new information right here.
>
> So I don't think there is a need for action (at least not at this point).
>

Agreed.

Let's keep the discussion to topics that are relevant to the future of
Scientific Linux.  Not the merits of capitalism vs communism, the motivations
of companies, etc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2