Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jan 2014 17:40:26 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 2014-01-27, at 15:48, Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 2014-01-27, at 15:36, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/2014 07:50 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>>> It seems there's a new flavor of libibverbs:
>>>
>>> SL/6.5 % find ./ -name libibverbs\*|grep -v 'repoview\|fastbugs'
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm
>>>
>>> 1) Why the i386 updates?
>>>
>>> 2) Why both flavors on x86_64? this seems not to make sense, since:
>>>
>>> SL/6.5 % rpm -qp --obsoletes ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>>> libibverbs < 1.1.8
>>>
>>> 3) Why no -rocee for i686?
>>>
>>> This makes updates fail on x86_64 systems with libibverbs.i686 installed.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the late report
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>
>> Hi Stephan,
>
> Hi Pat,
>
>> I'm trying to follow SA-2013-1661 and EA-2013-1740, there are a lot of packages listed out on those pages.
>>
>> The i386 packages were removed by accident during the build process and restored. Somehow I missed the security packages during my clean up. Fixed.
>>
>> As for both flavors being in SL 6.5, the two listed updates above were published with upstream's release of 6.5, so I'm attempting follow that closely.
>
> I now see -rocee is from the High Performance Network add-on. Having them in the SL base seems consistent with how other add-ons (scalable filesystem etc.) are handled. On the other hand, those don't replace base packages. Maybe this one is a case for doing it differently?
Looking closer, it seems the only difference between libibverbs-1.1.7 and libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7 is the name.
Stephan
>> The missing -rocee i686 packages in x86_64 is more of a puzzle. My archived copy of EA-2013-1740 from 2013-11-21 does not show the i686 packages in x86_64, but the current publication does. There was probably a documentation error somewhere. I'll get the fixes staged up.
>
> It would be nice to get the corresponding packages from RHBA-2013-1830 into fastbugs too, since the ones from RHBA-2013-1830 seem rather broken.
>
> Again, sorry for bringing this up the very day you wanted to release 6.5 :-(
>
> Stephan
>
>> Thanks for the bug report!
>>
>> Pat
--
Stephan Wiesand
DESY - DV -
Platanenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany
|
|
|