On 2014-01-27, at 15:48, Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On 2014-01-27, at 15:36, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> On 01/27/2014 07:50 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote: >>> It seems there's a new flavor of libibverbs: >>> >>> SL/6.5 % find ./ -name libibverbs\*|grep -v 'repoview\|fastbugs' >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./i386/updates/security/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-utils-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-static-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-devel-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> ./i386/os/Packages/libibverbs-1.1.7-1.el6.i686.rpm >>> >>> 1) Why the i386 updates? >>> >>> 2) Why both flavors on x86_64? this seems not to make sense, since: >>> >>> SL/6.5 % rpm -qp --obsoletes ./x86_64/os/Packages/libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>> libibverbs < 1.1.8 >>> >>> 3) Why no -rocee for i686? >>> >>> This makes updates fail on x86_64 systems with libibverbs.i686 installed. >>> >>> Sorry for the late report >>> Stephan >>> >> >> Hi Stephan, > > Hi Pat, > >> I'm trying to follow SA-2013-1661 and EA-2013-1740, there are a lot of packages listed out on those pages. >> >> The i386 packages were removed by accident during the build process and restored. Somehow I missed the security packages during my clean up. Fixed. >> >> As for both flavors being in SL 6.5, the two listed updates above were published with upstream's release of 6.5, so I'm attempting follow that closely. > > I now see -rocee is from the High Performance Network add-on. Having them in the SL base seems consistent with how other add-ons (scalable filesystem etc.) are handled. On the other hand, those don't replace base packages. Maybe this one is a case for doing it differently? Looking closer, it seems the only difference between libibverbs-1.1.7 and libibverbs-rocee-1.1.7 is the name. Stephan >> The missing -rocee i686 packages in x86_64 is more of a puzzle. My archived copy of EA-2013-1740 from 2013-11-21 does not show the i686 packages in x86_64, but the current publication does. There was probably a documentation error somewhere. I'll get the fixes staged up. > > It would be nice to get the corresponding packages from RHBA-2013-1830 into fastbugs too, since the ones from RHBA-2013-1830 seem rather broken. > > Again, sorry for bringing this up the very day you wanted to release 6.5 :-( > > Stephan > >> Thanks for the bug report! >> >> Pat -- Stephan Wiesand DESY - DV - Platanenallee 6 15738 Zeuthen, Germany