On 04/05/2013 08:06 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On 04/05/2013 07:38 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
>>> On 5 April 2013 16:57, Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> First release candidates (2013-04-05) of SL 6.4 LiveCD, LiveMiniCD and
>>>> LiveDVD for 32-bit and 64-bit are now availablefor testing:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.livecd.ethz.ch/download/testing/64/i386
>>>> http://www.livecd.ethz.ch/download/testing/64/x86_64
>>>>
>>>> In order to squeeze the LiveCD under 700MB, I had to remove the following
>>>> packages: spice-xpi, system-config-printer, libsmbclient and foomatic.
>>>>
>>>> In addition, there is a testing version for a NONPAE LiveCD available.
>>>> This
>>>> LiveCD is based on the NONPAE kernel-lt from
>>>> http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt
>>>> I don't know, if this should go into the official release. But this would
>>>> allow people with NONPAE hardware to install SL6.4. Any opinion on that?
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a NONPAE hardware to test. Can anybody test
>>>> SL-64-i386-2013-04-05-LiveCD-NONPAE.iso on a NONPAE hardware?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>       Urs
>>> Hi Urs,
>>>
>>> One quick comment. If you have a 32-bit system available, surely you
>>> could test your SL-64-i386-2013-04-05-LiveCD-NONPAE.iso offering?
>>> After all, it's not as if you are wishing to test the normal kernel
>>> (i.e. a PAE kernel) on none-PAE able 32-bit hardware!
>>>
>>> Alan.
>>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> I have tested SL-64-i386-2013-04-05-LiveCD-NONPAE.iso on a "normal" 32-bit
>> system. I was just wondering, if somebody has an old system where the
>> standard SL LiveCD does not work, but the LiveCD-NONPAE is working.
>>
>> Urs
> Hi Urs,
>
> I am trying to find if I have nonPAE hardware. In the meantime, it
> would be great if you can supply hash values for the isos. sha1 or
> even md5 will do.

Of course, done.

     Urs