On 04/05/2013 08:06 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> On 04/05/2013 07:38 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote: >>> On 5 April 2013 16:57, Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> First release candidates (2013-04-05) of SL 6.4 LiveCD, LiveMiniCD and >>>> LiveDVD for 32-bit and 64-bit are now availablefor testing: >>>> >>>> http://www.livecd.ethz.ch/download/testing/64/i386 >>>> http://www.livecd.ethz.ch/download/testing/64/x86_64 >>>> >>>> In order to squeeze the LiveCD under 700MB, I had to remove the following >>>> packages: spice-xpi, system-config-printer, libsmbclient and foomatic. >>>> >>>> In addition, there is a testing version for a NONPAE LiveCD available. >>>> This >>>> LiveCD is based on the NONPAE kernel-lt from >>>> http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt >>>> I don't know, if this should go into the official release. But this would >>>> allow people with NONPAE hardware to install SL6.4. Any opinion on that? >>>> >>>> I don't have a NONPAE hardware to test. Can anybody test >>>> SL-64-i386-2013-04-05-LiveCD-NONPAE.iso on a NONPAE hardware? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Urs >>> Hi Urs, >>> >>> One quick comment. If you have a 32-bit system available, surely you >>> could test your SL-64-i386-2013-04-05-LiveCD-NONPAE.iso offering? >>> After all, it's not as if you are wishing to test the normal kernel >>> (i.e. a PAE kernel) on none-PAE able 32-bit hardware! >>> >>> Alan. >> >> Hi Alan, >> >> I have tested SL-64-i386-2013-04-05-LiveCD-NONPAE.iso on a "normal" 32-bit >> system. I was just wondering, if somebody has an old system where the >> standard SL LiveCD does not work, but the LiveCD-NONPAE is working. >> >> Urs > Hi Urs, > > I am trying to find if I have nonPAE hardware. In the meantime, it > would be great if you can supply hash values for the isos. sha1 or > even md5 will do. Of course, done. Urs