On 15/02/2012 3:26 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 10:14 AM, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14 February 2012 15:52, Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Out of interest, is there any way to see (easily) if the patch
>> attached applies cleanly to the build environment used to rebuild
>> the SL packages?
>>
>>
>> It applies cleanly to
>> http://vault.centos.org/6.2/updates/Source/SPackages/glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.5.src.rpm
>> build through mock. At least for me :)
>
> I can confirm the same for SL

Ok, now it comes down to a policy thing... The bug just got closed with:

--- Comment #5 from Jeff Law <[log in to unmask]> 2012-02-14 11:14:59 EST ---
This is a duplicate of 752122, which is scheduled to be fixed in Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 6.3.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 752122 ***

This means until RHEL 6.3 is released, they won't be fixing it.

As we're in 6.2 RC2, and I can't find a date for TUV to release 6.3, how 
should we handle this bug?

--
Steven Haigh

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299