On 15/02/2012 3:26 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > On 02/14/2012 10:14 AM, Bart Swedrowski wrote: >> >> >> On 14 February 2012 15:52, Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask] >> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> Out of interest, is there any way to see (easily) if the patch >> attached applies cleanly to the build environment used to rebuild >> the SL packages? >> >> >> It applies cleanly to >> http://vault.centos.org/6.2/updates/Source/SPackages/glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.5.src.rpm >> build through mock. At least for me :) > > I can confirm the same for SL Ok, now it comes down to a policy thing... The bug just got closed with: --- Comment #5 from Jeff Law <[log in to unmask]> 2012-02-14 11:14:59 EST --- This is a duplicate of 752122, which is scheduled to be fixed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 752122 *** This means until RHEL 6.3 is released, they won't be fixing it. As we're in 6.2 RC2, and I can't find a date for TUV to release 6.3, how should we handle this bug? -- Steven Haigh Email: [log in to unmask] Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 Fax: (03) 8338 0299