Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:08:51 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 02/14/2011 05:34 PM, Hubert Bahr wrote:
> Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>> The SL 6.0 repo structure should be the same as the SL 6rolling repo.
>> We don't seperate things by Client, Server, or Optional.
>> The only change I'm thinking might be with the source rpm's. I'm
>> thinking of moving the whole directory up one so instead of it being
>> source/SRPMS it is just SRPMS
>>
>>
> In this case, since you are already customizing the comps ... xml would
> you consider adding a buildsys-build group so we could perform mock
> builds directly from your repo or our local mirrors without further
> customization.
>
> Also the hard links that are giving me the most problems are in the
> updates section.
>
> Hubert
>
I hadn't even thought of making a buildsys-build group. That should be
a piece of cake and save everyone some work.
I am assuming that everyone would be fine with what we built the rpm's with.
bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils findutils gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip
info make patch sl-release redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed shadow-utils
tar unzip util-linux-ng which
This is the same as Fedora (except for the sl-release).
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|