On 02/14/2011 05:34 PM, Hubert Bahr wrote: > Troy Dawson wrote: >> >>> >>> >> The SL 6.0 repo structure should be the same as the SL 6rolling repo. >> We don't seperate things by Client, Server, or Optional. >> The only change I'm thinking might be with the source rpm's. I'm >> thinking of moving the whole directory up one so instead of it being >> source/SRPMS it is just SRPMS >> >> > In this case, since you are already customizing the comps ... xml would > you consider adding a buildsys-build group so we could perform mock > builds directly from your repo or our local mirrors without further > customization. > > Also the hard links that are giving me the most problems are in the > updates section. > > Hubert > I hadn't even thought of making a buildsys-build group. That should be a piece of cake and save everyone some work. I am assuming that everyone would be fine with what we built the rpm's with. bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils findutils gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip info make patch sl-release redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux-ng which This is the same as Fedora (except for the sl-release). Troy -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group __________________________________________________