LISTSERV - SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

October 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

	LISTSERV Archives
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Home
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL October 2010

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: SL6 Pre-Alpha released
From:	Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:18:13 +0200
Content-Type:	multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (993 bytes) , smime.p7s (2302 bytes)

Hi Troy,

On Oct 15, 2010, at 22:38 , Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hello,
> In order to get development moving for SL6, we have created a Pre-Alpha release.
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/

great news. Thanks!

> This is based off the latest public beta of RHEL6 from RedHat.

The beta 2 refresh?

> We have recompiled most of the rpm's, but not all, so some of them are RedHat's rpm's.
> 
> At the time I am sending this email, there is only a network install.

Fine.

> But I am currently compiling a DVD  that has the install on it.
> 
> Did I mention that this is for development.
> Please don't complain about bugs RedHat should fix.

I'll try this a.s.a.p., which hopefully means "next week". Without having looked at it in detail yet, how did you go about server vs. workstation and that "optional" repo? It seems you collapsed everything into os/<arch>/Packages? How final is this layout? No more "SL" ?

	Stephan 

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV