SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

October 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:18:13 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Reply-To:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary=Apple-Mail-333--367351036
Subject:
From:
Stephan Wiesand <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (993 bytes) , smime.p7s (2302 bytes)
Hi Troy,

On Oct 15, 2010, at 22:38 , Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hello,
> In order to get development moving for SL6, we have created a Pre-Alpha release.
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/

great news. Thanks!

> This is based off the latest public beta of RHEL6 from RedHat.

The beta 2 refresh?

> We have recompiled most of the rpm's, but not all, so some of them are RedHat's rpm's.
> 
> At the time I am sending this email, there is only a network install.

Fine.

> But I am currently compiling a DVD  that has the install on it.
> 
> Did I mention that this is for development.
> Please don't complain about bugs RedHat should fix.

I'll try this a.s.a.p., which hopefully means "next week". Without having looked at it in detail yet, how did you go about server vs. workstation and that "optional" repo? It seems you collapsed everything into os/<arch>/Packages? How final is this layout? No more "SL" ?

	Stephan 

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany



ATOM RSS1 RSS2