SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: glib2-2.12.3-4.el5_3.1.x86_64 and /lib64/libglib-2.0.so
From:
Ron Rechenmacher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:26:43 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
yes, this helps. (I should have known)
Thanks,
Ron

Matthias Schroeder wrote:
> Ron Rechenmacher wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On my SL5 x86_64 machine, I tried to build a package that wanted 
>> libglib-2.0 and it could not build because although 
>> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 exists, the sym link /lib64/libglib-2.0.so did 
>> not. The rpm that /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 belongs to is 
>> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.  Should the install of this rpm create the 
>> link? Assuming so, could someone check to see if it does or not.
>> I created the link myself so that my software builds, but I would like 
>> to know if my system somehow deleted the link.
> 
> The rpm that should provide libglib-2.0 is glib2-devel.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Matthias
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ron
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2