yes, this helps. (I should have known) Thanks, Ron Matthias Schroeder wrote: > Ron Rechenmacher wrote: >> Hi, >> On my SL5 x86_64 machine, I tried to build a package that wanted >> libglib-2.0 and it could not build because although >> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 exists, the sym link /lib64/libglib-2.0.so did >> not. The rpm that /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 belongs to is >> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0. Should the install of this rpm create the >> link? Assuming so, could someone check to see if it does or not. >> I created the link myself so that my software builds, but I would like >> to know if my system somehow deleted the link. > > The rpm that should provide libglib-2.0 is glib2-devel. > > Hope this helps, > > Matthias > >> Thanks, >> Ron >