Ed Brown wrote:
> Tim,
> 
> It's interesting that the rpms for the 3.05 version of syslog-ng are
> correctly named with a "x86_64.rpm" extension.  Perhaps you could use
> those and sidestep this problem?
> 
> -Ed

Thanks, I didn't notice they'd released that but it fixes the problem. I
also checked again and it looks like RHEL5.4 has the same behaviour
(ignoring amd64 arch) so I guess there's no fault in SL.

Tim