Ed Brown wrote: > Tim, > > It's interesting that the rpms for the 3.05 version of syslog-ng are > correctly named with a "x86_64.rpm" extension. Perhaps you could use > those and sidestep this problem? > > -Ed Thanks, I didn't notice they'd released that but it fixes the problem. I also checked again and it looks like RHEL5.4 has the same behaviour (ignoring amd64 arch) so I guess there's no fault in SL. Tim