LISTSERV - SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

	LISTSERV Archives
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Home
	SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS September 2009

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: which repositories select in order to access scientific packages
From:	Peter Lemenkov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Peter Lemenkov <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:55 +0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (22 lines)

2009/9/29 Alexandre Pereira <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hi Forum
>
> I would like to access scientific packages ( supposing these applications
> are already packaged ... ) like Paraview, GMSH, Netgen, OpenCascade... etc.
>
> Must I enable some new repositories in my yum.repos.d, ?

EPEL would be nice addition. Although not all scientific packages,
existed in Fedora repository, were included into it yet, but their
number is steadily growing.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

Everyone's  participation is welcome.
The main reason, why people doesn't rebuild packages for RHEL-derived
distributions is the lack of interest (and therefore testing) from end
users, e.g. you :)

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV