SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:55 +0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Peter Lemenkov <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject:
Re: which repositories select in order to access scientific packages
From:
Peter Lemenkov <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Alexandre Pereira <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
2009/9/29 Alexandre Pereira <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hi Forum
>
> I would like to access scientific packages ( supposing these applications
> are already packaged ... ) like Paraview, GMSH, Netgen, OpenCascade... etc.
>
> Must I enable some new repositories in my yum.repos.d, ?

EPEL would be nice addition. Although not all scientific packages,
existed in Fedora repository, were included into it yet, but their
number is steadily growing.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

Everyone's  participation is welcome.
The main reason, why people doesn't rebuild packages for RHEL-derived
distributions is the lack of interest (and therefore testing) from end
users, e.g. you :)

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2