On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Stephan Wiesand<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 11:30 +0200, Urs Beyerle wrote:

> That would be the same as in a trigger *on* kernel.rpm *in*
> kernel-module-xfs.rpm, except that the trigger works independent of
> installation order.
>
> NB I think such a change should not be introduced before the next minor
> release.
>
>> > Or wait for 5.4 :-)
>>
>> Will RHEL include xfs in 5.4?
>
> Apparently, yes, finally.

I have been wondering if SL can adopt kABI-tracking kmod packages.
For example, CentOS is now offering kmod-xfs that is kernel version
independent.  It uses the weak-modules script which sets up a symlink
for all kABI compatible kernels installed.  It should eliminate the
issue reported in this thread.

Akemi