On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Stephan Wiesand<[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 11:30 +0200, Urs Beyerle wrote: > That would be the same as in a trigger *on* kernel.rpm *in* > kernel-module-xfs.rpm, except that the trigger works independent of > installation order. > > NB I think such a change should not be introduced before the next minor > release. > >> > Or wait for 5.4 :-) >> >> Will RHEL include xfs in 5.4? > > Apparently, yes, finally. I have been wondering if SL can adopt kABI-tracking kmod packages. For example, CentOS is now offering kmod-xfs that is kernel version independent. It uses the weak-modules script which sets up a symlink for all kABI compatible kernels installed. It should eliminate the issue reported in this thread. Akemi