On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Steve Traylen wrote:
<snip>
>
> It has been ages since I 've done this but certainly in the past the
> mount needed both
> a nolock and nfsvers=2
>
> mount -o nolock,nfsvers=2

I'm pretty sure that we don't need to add nfsvers any more - I know we 
don't use it.  I'm not sure if the nolock is really needed any more but we 
still do that - though we also start up the nfslock stuff too as well :-)

We now do nfs mounts in %pre as well since we found that nfs access to our 
extra local repos (via file:// locations) is faster (and uses less memory) 
than either ftp: or http: forms of access from anaconda.

-- 
Jon Peatfield,  Computer Officer,  DAMTP,  University of Cambridge
Mail:  [log in to unmask]     Web:  http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/