On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Steve Traylen wrote: <snip> > > It has been ages since I 've done this but certainly in the past the > mount needed both > a nolock and nfsvers=2 > > mount -o nolock,nfsvers=2 I'm pretty sure that we don't need to add nfsvers any more - I know we don't use it. I'm not sure if the nolock is really needed any more but we still do that - though we also start up the nfslock stuff too as well :-) We now do nfs mounts in %pre as well since we found that nfs access to our extra local repos (via file:// locations) is faster (and uses less memory) than either ftp: or http: forms of access from anaconda. -- Jon Peatfield, Computer Officer, DAMTP, University of Cambridge Mail: [log in to unmask] Web: http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/