0.9.8b-8.3.2 is *not* in the list that you show, only 0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2

Please send the output of

   yum list openssl\*


Troy

Faye Gibbins wrote:
> We get all our updates from:
> 
> rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security
> 
> Viz:
> 
> fgibbins@geosl548 home $ rsync
> rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security/
> | grep openssl
> -rw-r--r--     1462393 2007/10/18 22:41:53 openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i686.rpm
> -rw-r--r--     1477608 2007/10/22 21:18:52
> openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
> -rw-r--r--     1932138 2007/10/18 22:41:53
> openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i386.rpm
> -rw-r--r--     1946437 2007/10/22 21:18:52
> openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
> -rw-r--r--       32527 2007/10/22 21:18:52
> openssl-perl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
> fgibbins@geosl548 home $
> 
> 
> Yours
> Faye
> 
> Troy Dawson wrote:
>> Faye Gibbins wrote:
>>> More repo problems on x86_64
>>>
>>> when trying to install openssl-devel our SL5.0 boxes insists on asking
>>> for an install of 'openssl = 0.9.8b-8.3.2' despite openssl release
>>> 8.3.el5.2 being installed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Should the openssl rpm have a release number "8.3.2" rather than
>>> "8.3.el5.2"?
>>>
>>> Yours
>>> Faye
>>>
>> Hi Faye,
>> By definition (not by reality) openssl 8.3.2 is *newer* than 8.3.el5.2.
>> It was a compile time mistake we made by not having %dist set.  (Long
>> story)
>>
>> But I could have sworn that I removed all the 8.3.2 rpm's.
>> Where is it trying to get it from?  I need to clean it up.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Troy


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________