0.9.8b-8.3.2 is *not* in the list that you show, only 0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2 Please send the output of yum list openssl\* Troy Faye Gibbins wrote: > We get all our updates from: > > rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security > > Viz: > > fgibbins@geosl548 home $ rsync > rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security/ > | grep openssl > -rw-r--r-- 1462393 2007/10/18 22:41:53 openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i686.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1477608 2007/10/22 21:18:52 > openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1932138 2007/10/18 22:41:53 > openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i386.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 1946437 2007/10/22 21:18:52 > openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r-- 32527 2007/10/22 21:18:52 > openssl-perl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm > fgibbins@geosl548 home $ > > > Yours > Faye > > Troy Dawson wrote: >> Faye Gibbins wrote: >>> More repo problems on x86_64 >>> >>> when trying to install openssl-devel our SL5.0 boxes insists on asking >>> for an install of 'openssl = 0.9.8b-8.3.2' despite openssl release >>> 8.3.el5.2 being installed. >>> >>> >>> Should the openssl rpm have a release number "8.3.2" rather than >>> "8.3.el5.2"? >>> >>> Yours >>> Faye >>> >> Hi Faye, >> By definition (not by reality) openssl 8.3.2 is *newer* than 8.3.el5.2. >> It was a compile time mistake we made by not having %dist set. (Long >> story) >> >> But I could have sworn that I removed all the 8.3.2 rpm's. >> Where is it trying to get it from? I need to clean it up. >> >> Thanks >> Troy -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group __________________________________________________