Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
>> Scientific Linux "SL 5.2" Release Candidate 2.5 for i386 & x86_64 June 24,
>> 2008
> 
>> **Graphviz
>> **      All packages are now there that were in SL 5.1
>> i386:
>> **      graphviz-2.18-2.sl.i386.rpm
> 
> # wget http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/i386/SL/graphviz-2.18-2.sl.i386.rpm
> # rpmquery -ip graphviz-2.18-2.sl.i386.rpm
> Name        : graphviz                     Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version     : 2.18                              Vendor: Dag Apt
> Repository, http://dag.wieers.com/apt/
> Release     : 2.sl                          Build Date: Mon 23 Jun 2008
> 22:41:47 BST
> Install Date: (not installed)               Build Host: norob.fnal.gov
> Group       : Applications/Multimedia       Source RPM:
> graphviz-2.18-2.sl.src.rpm
> Size        : 2791053                          License: CPL
> Packager    : Dag Wieers <[log in to unmask]>
> URL         : http://www.graphviz.org/
> Summary     : Graph Visualization Tools
> Description :
> A collection of tools and tcl packages for the manipulation and layout
> of graphs (as in nodes and edges, not as in barcharts).
> 
> Any particular reason to leave an SL-built package labelled Dag ?
> 

Dag created the spec file.  I only made minor modifications to update it to 
2.18, so I still consider it his spec file, and so is the packager.
Or are you talking about the Vendor label?
I just saw that right now. I didn't know he had it hard coded in.  I'll have to 
change that, although I do not consider it a big enough bug for a respin.  But 
*if* we do have a RC 2.75 because of something big, I'll be sure to fix it.

>> x86_64:
>> **    graphviz-2.18-2.sl.x86_64.rpm
> 
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/x86_64/SL/
> still has graphviz-*2.18-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
> 
> Similarly we have
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/i386/SL/emacs-21.4-20.el5.i386.rpm
> but
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/x86_64/SL/emacs-21.4-18.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
> 
> 

Sorry about that.  x86_64 was still over at 5rolling and hadn't been moved over 
to 52.  The correct rpm's are there for x86_64 now.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________