SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Glenn Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 May 2007 10:36:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Troy Dawson wrote:

>> Regarding the installer, I saw some mentions of RHEL Beta. SL is
>> compiled using the RHEL final release sources, right? That mentions of
>> Beta was left accidentally from previous builds?
>> 
>
> Where are you seeing mentions of RHEL Beta?

I also thought I noticed this during an install at some point.

IIRC, the install displays two lines above the progress bar on the
left. Is one the package version and the other the summary? If so, I
think I was noticing the install of the Deployment Guide:

rpm -qip Deployment_Guide-en-US-5.0.0-21.noarch.rpm

Summary     : Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 - Beta

ATOM RSS1 RSS2