SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 May 2007 10:36:50 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Glenn Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
Re: Installation Notes
From:
Glenn Morris <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> cc: Claudiu Tanaselia <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Troy Dawson wrote:

>> Regarding the installer, I saw some mentions of RHEL Beta. SL is
>> compiled using the RHEL final release sources, right? That mentions of
>> Beta was left accidentally from previous builds?
>> 
>
> Where are you seeing mentions of RHEL Beta?

I also thought I noticed this during an install at some point.

IIRC, the install displays two lines above the progress bar on the
left. Is one the package version and the other the summary? If so, I
think I was noticing the install of the Deployment Guide:

rpm -qip Deployment_Guide-en-US-5.0.0-21.noarch.rpm

Summary     : Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 - Beta

ATOM RSS1 RSS2