SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

May 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ralph Angenendt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ralph Angenendt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 May 2007 11:36:22 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (947 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes)
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 5/24/07, Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >At Sunday Time we spent a lot of time for testing of desktop environment
> >in a fresh installation from SL50 and was slightly frustrated by
> >crushing of Evolution during startup. In CentOS Evolution started
> >without problems (but it has version 2.8.0-33, not 2.8.0-33.0.1).
> >
> 
> Yes there were a lot of issues the CentOS team found with the default
> Evolution. They had to back port a couple of issues to get stability
> in place. Crap. I must have forgotten to put it in the
> RELEASE_NOTES... if I did, sorry

If we did, it's not in the changelog of the evolution rpm. And I cannot
really find anything regarding that with a quick search. *AND*: We're
at 2.8.0-33.0.1.el5 also (when you count in the 0day updates which
occured *directly* after release).

But yes, we found a lot of issues with Evolution: One is that it's still
not an app one wants to use :)

Cheers,

Ralph


ATOM RSS1 RSS2