Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2007 11:36:22 +0200 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
multipart/signed; boundary=gKMricLos+KVdGMg;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-disposition: |
inline |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 5/24/07, Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >At Sunday Time we spent a lot of time for testing of desktop environment
> >in a fresh installation from SL50 and was slightly frustrated by
> >crushing of Evolution during startup. In CentOS Evolution started
> >without problems (but it has version 2.8.0-33, not 2.8.0-33.0.1).
> >
>
> Yes there were a lot of issues the CentOS team found with the default
> Evolution. They had to back port a couple of issues to get stability
> in place. Crap. I must have forgotten to put it in the
> RELEASE_NOTES... if I did, sorry
If we did, it's not in the changelog of the evolution rpm. And I cannot
really find anything regarding that with a quick search. *AND*: We're
at 2.8.0-33.0.1.el5 also (when you count in the 0day updates which
occured *directly* after release).
But yes, we found a lot of issues with Evolution: One is that it's still
not an app one wants to use :)
Cheers,
Ralph
|
|
|