SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karanbir Singh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Karanbir Singh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:23:27 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> I stopped looking at apt when x86_64 became an important platform, and x86 
> compatibility was just as important, and RH did it the "multiarch" way, 
> and apt simply couldn't handle that. This was more than two years ago and 
> may have changed. Has it?

Take a look at some of the changelog here : http://apt-rpm.org/

 >
 > Note this really is not about starting an "apt vs. yum" debate.
 >

They both have their place, for example on lower end machines specially 
when there are RAM limitations, yum can be a problem with usability 
being extremely low.

- KB

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

ATOM RSS1 RSS2