SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karanbir Singh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Karanbir Singh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:21:31 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Troy Dawson wrote:
> I'm all for keeping apt completely out of the release.  I don't know 
> about the SLC part, but for the SL part, when we push out updates, it's 
> now taking hours for SL 3.  And the majority of the time is building the 
> apt repositories.

why not use the new Apt ? it uses the rpm-metadata ( that yum uses ) for 
its backend stuff, and its functional on everything from RH7.3 to EL5.

- KB

ATOM RSS1 RSS2