Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hi,
> This is my last e-mail for the day. I'm going to go home and think, but
> here are some thoughts.
>
Mine too, I'm going to sleep ;-)
> First - I think that for at least S.L. 5.0 we should do it completely
> independent of CentOS.
[..]
> So, I'm planning on forging ahead with S.L. 5.0 on our own, no matter
> what we decide for S.L. 5.1.
My personal feeling (and past experiences when going from
RH 6 -> 7 -> CEL3 -> SLC3 -> SLC4) is that the good
time for a change is rather between major than minor releases ...
(but this is just my 2 cents..)
> Cons:
> CentOS does *not* have an open development cycle. There are no beta's.
> For the average user, it just comes.
I think they actually do have this:
http://beta.centos.org/
Jarek
__
-------------------------------------------------------
_ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/FIO/LA _
_ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
_____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _