Troy Dawson wrote: > Hi, > This is my last e-mail for the day. I'm going to go home and think, but > here are some thoughts. > Mine too, I'm going to sleep ;-) > First - I think that for at least S.L. 5.0 we should do it completely > independent of CentOS. [..] > So, I'm planning on forging ahead with S.L. 5.0 on our own, no matter > what we decide for S.L. 5.1. My personal feeling (and past experiences when going from RH 6 -> 7 -> CEL3 -> SLC3 -> SLC4) is that the good time for a change is rather between major than minor releases ... (but this is just my 2 cents..) > Cons: > CentOS does *not* have an open development cycle. There are no beta's. > For the average user, it just comes. I think they actually do have this: http://beta.centos.org/ Jarek __ ------------------------------------------------------- _ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/FIO/LA _ _ http://home.cern.ch/~jpolok ___ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _ _____________________________________ +41_78_792_0795 _