SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

February 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Future of Scientific Linux (or what next) ? - invitation to a discussion ...
From:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:02:55 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (638 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes) 
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:25:20PM +0100, Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> Just investigating for the future: or shall we (we = all
> of us using SL(X) go Scientific Linux 5 .. or maybe re-base
> to CentOS 5 ?

it sounds like a very sensible thing, but as most things in OSS it
mostkly depends on how the SL core developers and the CentOS
developers will talk together. I think they will be welcoming this
move, and will be open for SL specific needs to enlargen their
userbase. They already have a centosplus repo for stuff != vendor.

I would suggest to talk with CentOS devs to probe their feelings on
something like that.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

ATOM RSS1 RSS2