SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:23:56 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (37 lines)
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Etienne Goyer wrote:

> Greetings folks,
> 
> Apologies in advance if this have been discussed before, I might have
> missed it.
> 
> I have a machine on SL 4.0.  I noticed a few days ago a lot of update
> where available via yum.  From what I understand,
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/4x/, which
> /etc/yum.repo.d/sl4x.repo specify, now appear to contain SL release 4.3.
>  I would rather stay on 4.0 to keep the amount of update and possible
> disruption low, so I changed the file back to specify
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/40.
> 
> Can we expect security updates for the 4.0 release ?  If not, I will
> move back to the 4x repo, but this would require a little planning (new
> glibc -> reboot, etc).

Security Updates will continue for 4.0 .  If you want the "bug fixes and 
new enhancements" then you will have to add them either manually by 
picking from the

   41, 42 , 43, 44, 4x repositories depending on which packages you want.

We made the 4x yum.conf so that uses that wanted to always be at the 
latest would just get there (expect for the kernel).  We have always had 
the individual releases independent.

-Connie Sieh

 > 
> Thanks !
> 
> Etienne
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2