SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jan Iven <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:28:38 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 08:25 -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Howdy,
> Back in May we talked some about moving to openafs 1.4.1, and we have 
> some rpm's for it at
> 
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/40rolling/testing/i386/RPMS/openafs
> 
> What did everyone think.  Should we move to it, or stay with 1.4.0 like 
> we currently have.
> As for myself, I'd like to move to it because we occasionally have users 
> have problems that I'm quite sure are fixed in 1.4.1

We are running on 1.4.1 (not the above version, we had several patches
trying to chase an (ancient) corruption) since last year. We did have
some issues initially (also related to these patches), but the current
version does not seem to pose particular problems.

Regards
jan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2