SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Maillling list for Scientific Linux developers worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:28:38 +0200
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Jan Iven <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain
Subject:
From:
Jan Iven <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
CERN
Comments:
To: Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 08:25 -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Howdy,
> Back in May we talked some about moving to openafs 1.4.1, and we have 
> some rpm's for it at
> 
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/40rolling/testing/i386/RPMS/openafs
> 
> What did everyone think.  Should we move to it, or stay with 1.4.0 like 
> we currently have.
> As for myself, I'd like to move to it because we occasionally have users 
> have problems that I'm quite sure are fixed in 1.4.1

We are running on 1.4.1 (not the above version, we had several patches
trying to chase an (ancient) corruption) since last year. We did have
some issues initially (also related to these patches), but the current
version does not seem to pose particular problems.

Regards
jan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2