Jon Peatfield wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Jaroslaw Polok wrote:
> 
>>>
>>>  Is anyone already looking at this, and of so is there anything I can 
>>> do to
>>>  help?
>>
>>
>> Yes, I did for our CERN update, here are the changes needed:
>>
>> 1. in SOURCES/firefox-mozconfig*:
>>
>> change --enable-pango to --disable-pango
> 
> 
> I'm trying to decide if upgrading to a new-enough pango would be better 
> (e.g. lifting the pango-1.6 from SL4x).  Given that ffox 1.0.8 is linked 
> against the pango 1.2 in SL3 I don't know if users will object to losing 
> internationalized text support...
> 
> What (if any) functionality does one actually lose by disabling pango?
> 
>> 2. in firefox.spec:
>>
>>  change desktop-utils define from 0.9 to 0.3,
>>  comment out scripts in post and postun sections.
>>  change requires to freetype-devel >= 2.1.4
>>  change requires to XFree86-devel instead of xorg-x11-devel
> 
> 
> Yup those look like what I just started with (based on the previous 
> changes for ffox 1.0.8)...
> 
> I guess that somewhere there are some 'default' bookmarks/homepages to 
> be hacked as well to remove any references to the Vendor... 

SOURCES/firefox-redhat-default-bookmarks.html

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________