Jon Peatfield wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Jaroslaw Polok wrote: > >>> >>> Is anyone already looking at this, and of so is there anything I can >>> do to >>> help? >> >> >> Yes, I did for our CERN update, here are the changes needed: >> >> 1. in SOURCES/firefox-mozconfig*: >> >> change --enable-pango to --disable-pango > > > I'm trying to decide if upgrading to a new-enough pango would be better > (e.g. lifting the pango-1.6 from SL4x). Given that ffox 1.0.8 is linked > against the pango 1.2 in SL3 I don't know if users will object to losing > internationalized text support... > > What (if any) functionality does one actually lose by disabling pango? > >> 2. in firefox.spec: >> >> change desktop-utils define from 0.9 to 0.3, >> comment out scripts in post and postun sections. >> change requires to freetype-devel >= 2.1.4 >> change requires to XFree86-devel instead of xorg-x11-devel > > > Yup those look like what I just started with (based on the previous > changes for ffox 1.0.8)... > > I guess that somewhere there are some 'default' bookmarks/homepages to > be hacked as well to remove any references to the Vendor... SOURCES/firefox-redhat-default-bookmarks.html Troy -- __________________________________________________ Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group __________________________________________________