SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:07:22 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
John A. Goebel said...

|You can answer part of this question by looking at the infrastructure requirements
|and performance profile of each filesystem (for example, AFS filesystem cloning
|is a big help, but AFS can be a lot to manage; do you need snapshot, etc.).

Is there a good FS comparison somewhere with both
a chart showing the features of each and some
in-depth analysis?

I've seen older comparisons of two or three, but
nothing new and comprehensive.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2