SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:07:22 -0600
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
From:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
John A. Goebel said...

|You can answer part of this question by looking at the infrastructure requirements
|and performance profile of each filesystem (for example, AFS filesystem cloning
|is a big help, but AFS can be a lot to manage; do you need snapshot, etc.).

Is there a good FS comparison somewhere with both
a chart showing the features of each and some
in-depth analysis?

I've seen older comparisons of two or three, but
nothing new and comprehensive.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2