Kuo Kan,

Thanks for giving us a update on this.  Let us know how the Intel 
compilers go.  I know we are researching them for i386 use here.  
Curious as how they do for x86_64.

-Connie Sieh

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Kuo Kan Liang wrote:

> Dear Connie and all,
> 
> Indeed I was stupid. I installed the Intel compilers, but the PATH was 
> pointing primarily to
> the ia32 version of the compiler. Now I uninstalled everything and 
> install the EM64T version alone,
> and it seems everything works.
> 
> I shall have a happy Christmas without having to reinstall the OS. 8)
> 
> Regrads,
> Kuo Kan LIANG
> Division of Mechanics,
> Research Center for Applied Sciences,
> Academia Sinica, Taiwan
> 
> >Kuo Kan,
> >
> >Have you asked Intel about the issues you had with their compilers?
> >
> >-Connie Sieh
> >
> >On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Kuo Kan Liang wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Thank Troy and Connie for the `positive' 'negative' answers toward other 
> >>solutions instead of reinstallation.
> >>I will do that. Actually before asking those questions, I have already 
> >>educated myself that I will do this before Christmas.
> >>
> >>One thing that makes me really sorry for doing this is that there had 
> >>been many people in this mailing list
> >>encourging me to use x86_64 Linux instead of i386 Linux.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
>