Kuo Kan, Thanks for giving us a update on this. Let us know how the Intel compilers go. I know we are researching them for i386 use here. Curious as how they do for x86_64. -Connie Sieh On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Kuo Kan Liang wrote: > Dear Connie and all, > > Indeed I was stupid. I installed the Intel compilers, but the PATH was > pointing primarily to > the ia32 version of the compiler. Now I uninstalled everything and > install the EM64T version alone, > and it seems everything works. > > I shall have a happy Christmas without having to reinstall the OS. 8) > > Regrads, > Kuo Kan LIANG > Division of Mechanics, > Research Center for Applied Sciences, > Academia Sinica, Taiwan > > >Kuo Kan, > > > >Have you asked Intel about the issues you had with their compilers? > > > >-Connie Sieh > > > >On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Kuo Kan Liang wrote: > > > > > > > >>Thank Troy and Connie for the `positive' 'negative' answers toward other > >>solutions instead of reinstallation. > >>I will do that. Actually before asking those questions, I have already > >>educated myself that I will do this before Christmas. > >> > >>One thing that makes me really sorry for doing this is that there had > >>been many people in this mailing list > >>encourging me to use x86_64 Linux instead of i386 Linux. > >> > >> > >> >