Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Brent L. Bates |
Date: | Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:54:02 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I say HOGWASH to Michael Mansour. SGI's XFS is know for BOTH SPEED AND
RELIABILITY! I would not use any other file system, no matter what the
file/partition size, except XFS. I demand dependability and reliability of
the file system and I get that and more from XFS. XFS has been around a lot
longer than ext3 and is a mature and reliable file system with over a decade
of testing and extended use from desktop machines to massive file servers. If
you want dependability, reliability, and speed, go with XFS.
I've had removable media corrupted by a hardware failure on one MO drive
and on a working drive I was able to salvage all the information. XFS managed
to recover everything. I thought for sure I was going to loose all the
information, but I didn't.
|
|
|