Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:54:02 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
Michael Mansour < [log in to unmask]> <"Re: ext3, xfs,
jfs on large partitions (fwd)"@fnal.gov> |
Organization: |
ViGYAN, Inc. |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I say HOGWASH to Michael Mansour. SGI's XFS is know for BOTH SPEED AND
RELIABILITY! I would not use any other file system, no matter what the
file/partition size, except XFS. I demand dependability and reliability of
the file system and I get that and more from XFS. XFS has been around a lot
longer than ext3 and is a mature and reliable file system with over a decade
of testing and extended use from desktop machines to massive file servers. If
you want dependability, reliability, and speed, go with XFS.
I've had removable media corrupted by a hardware failure on one MO drive
and on a working drive I was able to salvage all the information. XFS managed
to recover everything. I thought for sure I was going to loose all the
information, but I didn't.
|
|
|