Jon,

I know we should have thought of easier to type name :-)

Yes the plan is to put them in the 305 bugfix area after testing is done.

-connie
On Mon, 3 Oct 
2005, Jon Peatfield wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Connie Sieh wrote:
> 
> > I have rebuilt all of the "generic"(did not have SL modifications)s rpm
> > for Update 6 for i386 and x86_64.
> >
> > These rpms are available from
> >
> > ftp://ftp.scientific.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/i386/errata/bugfix/RPMS/
> > ftp://ftp.scientific.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/x86_64/errata/bugfix/RPMS/
> 
> It took me 5 attempts before I noticed that it should probably be:
> 
>    ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/...
> 
> ftp.scientific.org seems to belong to a totally different project :-)
> 
> > Both of these areas are yumable.
> >
> > The only Update 6 rpms that are NOT included here are
> >
> > anaconda-9.1.6.8-2.RHEL.src.rpm  	Have to put in the SL changes
> > redhat-artwork-0.73.3-2E.src.rpm	Have to put in the SL changes
> > firstboot-1.1.33-1.src.rpm		Have to put in the SL changes
> > redhat-release-3AS-13.6.2.src.rpm	This turns into sl-release
> >
> > The Update 6 kernel was just released to the "errata" area as it is a
> > security errata.
> >
> > Please test these rpms and let us know if there are any issues with them.
> 
> Is the plan to put them into:
> 
>   .../linux/scientific/305/.../errata/bugfix/RPMS/
> 
> once they have been tested enough?  If so I ought to check that my scripts 
> know to rsync that from your servers...
> 
> > Thanks
> >
> > -Connie Sieh
> 
>